Main Article Content
Abstract
Pengembangan inovasi bahan konstruksi dibutuhkan untuk memastikan pemenuhan kebutuhan pasar. Batako sebagai komoditi besar di sektor pembangunan ditargetkan dapat memenuhi kebutuhan kekuatan namun dengan harga yang sesuai. Sebagian besar penelitian mengenai pengembangan bahan penyusun batako melakukan subtitusi agregat halus dengan material bottom-ash. Material sisa ini seringkali tidak dimanfaatkan dengan baik, sehingga jumlahnya melimpah tanpa manfaat. Eksperimen dilakukan untuk mengetahui nilai kuat tekan batako dengan agregat bottom-ash, kemudian dihitung analisis biaya kebutuhan produksi dengan metode full-costing. Sehingga disimpulkan kelayakan batako untuk dapat dipasarkan. Studi terdahulu menunjukan campuran 1PC:5BA termasuk kategori mutu II, III, dan IV menurut SNI 03-0349. Hasil perhitungan dengan komposisi tersebut menghasilkan harga produksi Rp. 2.254,2 per batako. Hal ini menunjukan dari segi harga, batako campuran bottom-ash layak untuk dipertimbangkan sebagai komoditi baru.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal TESLINK : Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal TESLINK : Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
- [1] CNN-Indonesia, “Data Limbah Batu Bara Milik ESDM dan KLHK Disebut,” CNN Indonesia, 2021. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210422042251-20-633115/data-limbah-batu-bara-milik-esdm-dan-klhk- disebut-tak-sinkron (accessed Jun. 12, 2022).
- [2] P. K. Gautam, P. Kalla, A. S. Jethoo, R. Agrawal, and H. Singh, “Sustainable use of waste in flexible pavement: A review,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 180, pp. 239–253, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.067.
- [3] A. Modarres and P. Ayar, “Coal waste application in recycled asphalt mixtures with bitumen emulsion,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 83, pp. 263–272, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.082.
- [4] A. Modarres and M. Rahmanzadeh, “Application of coal waste powder as filler in hot mix asphalt,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 66, pp. 476–483, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.002.
- [5] K. Ksaibati, S. Rama, and K. Sayiri, “Utilization of Wyoming Bottom Ash in Asphalt Mixes,” no. March, p. 102, 2006. [6] S. A. Mohammed et al., “A review of the utilization of coal bottom ash (Cba) in the construction industry,” Sustain.,
- vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13148031.
- [7] E. Aydin, “Novel coal bottom ash waste composites for sustainable construction,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 124, pp. 582–588, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.142.
- [8] M. Basuni and K. Iskandar, “Analisis Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi Dalam Menentukan Harga Jual Pada Rajaswa Coffee,” J. Econ. Manag., vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 18–24, 2021, doi: 10.46772/jecma.v1i02.357.
- [9] C. Ratnasih and R. A. Sulbahri, “Full Costing Method Model and Variable Costing Method Against Cement Price Determination (Case in Indonesia),” Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 284–288, 2022, doi: 10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.2.1378.
- [10]A. Safiki and C. E. Program, “ANALYSING COST IMPLICATIONS OF BUILDING DESIGN VARIABLES AS AREAS OF MODELLING TO ACHIEVE VALUE FOR MONEY A Study on Selected Buildings in Surakarta and Surrounding Areas,” 2016.
- [11]R. S. Harjanti, Hetika, and S. Murwanti, “Analisis Harga Pokok Produksi dan Harga Jual dengan Metode Cost Plus Pricing (Studi Kasus pada UKM Wedang Umuh 3Gen Tegal),” Benefit J. Manaj. dan Bisnis, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 84–97, 2021.
- [12]A. Fauziyyah, “ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN METODE FULL COSTING DENGAN VARIABLE COSTING SEBAGAI DASAR PENENTUAN HARGA JUAL PRODUK,” Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2018. (unpublished)
- [13]R. Ristinah, A. Zacoeb, A. M. . Soehardjono, and D. Setyowulan, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Bottom Ash Sebagai Pengganti Semen Pada campuran Batako Terhadap Kuat Tekan Batako,” J. Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 6, p. 3, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://rekayasasipil.ub.ac.id/index.php/rs/article/view/225.
- [14]Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “Spesifikasi Bata beton untuk pasangan dinding,” Sni 03-0349-1989, 1989. http://sispk.bsn.go.id/SNI/DetailSNI/646 (accessed Jun. 21, 2022).
- [15]BSN, “PERSYARATAN UMUM BAHAN BANGUNAN Dl INDONESIA (PUBI - 1982),” 1982. https://simantu.pu.go.id/personal/img-post/autocover/5093c1377acb71720fc692e637db990e.pdf (accessed Jul. 12, 2022).